CONNIE DE JONGE
Originally published in De Telegraaf on Oct. 12, 2023
News article summary:
In a recent news article, De Telegraaf looks at The Amsterdam Court’s Verdict, a victory for Temper workers' autonomy. The article points out that in a significant turn of events, the Amsterdam court has ruled against trade unions FNV and CNV, asserting that they do not have the authority to represent the approximately 15,000 workers associated with the Temper platform. This decision marks a two-year legal battle where the unions sought to categorise self-employed individuals as employees, a move halted by the recent court ruling.
Co-founder Niels Arntz lauded the court's decision as "historic," reiterating that the platform's users—numbering over 30,000—intentionally seek a flexible, non-traditional work arrangement, contrary to the unions' push for employment contracts.
The court's judgment was influenced by around 15,000 Temper workers who actively communicated their dissent to the unions through an opt-out email earlier this year. These workers view their jobs as valuable, flexible side gigs, distinct from conventional temporary employment. This sentiment reflects a broader perspective that rejects the unions' portrayal of Temper's offerings as exploitative "modern-day labourer work."
While the unions frame their legal battle as principled, aiming to prevent the platform from encouraging self-employment that circumvents contributions to the Dutch social system, the court recognises the substantial number of workers uninterested in this perspective. The judges suggest terminating collective action only in matters directly related to the interests of Temper workers.
FNV Flex director Erik Pentenga expressed disappointment, labelling the court's decision as questionable and accusing Temper of spreading misinformation. The judges, however, dismissed this claim, stating that the defence failed and emphasising the necessity of clear rules regarding platform work in the Netherlands.
This development adds a new chapter to the ongoing struggle between unions and emerging gig economy platforms. As the legal battles with Uber and Deliveroo continue, the court's decision suggests that establishing proper regulations for platform-based work remains a crucial task. The verdict reflects a balancing act between workers seeking autonomy and unions advocating for broader societal contributions in an evolving employment landscape.
Read the original article here.
CONNIE DE JONGE
Originally published in De Telegraaf on Oct. 12, 2023
News article summary:
In a recent news article, De Telegraaf looks at The Amsterdam Court’s Verdict, a victory for Temper workers' autonomy. The article points out that in a significant turn of events, the Amsterdam court has ruled against trade unions FNV and CNV, asserting that they do not have the authority to represent the approximately 15,000 workers associated with the Temper platform. This decision marks a two-year legal battle where the unions sought to categorise self-employed individuals as employees, a move halted by the recent court ruling.
Co-founder Niels Arntz lauded the court's decision as "historic," reiterating that the platform's users—numbering over 30,000—intentionally seek a flexible, non-traditional work arrangement, contrary to the unions' push for employment contracts.
The court's judgment was influenced by around 15,000 Temper workers who actively communicated their dissent to the unions through an opt-out email earlier this year. These workers view their jobs as valuable, flexible side gigs, distinct from conventional temporary employment. This sentiment reflects a broader perspective that rejects the unions' portrayal of Temper's offerings as exploitative "modern-day labourer work."
While the unions frame their legal battle as principled, aiming to prevent the platform from encouraging self-employment that circumvents contributions to the Dutch social system, the court recognises the substantial number of workers uninterested in this perspective. The judges suggest terminating collective action only in matters directly related to the interests of Temper workers.
FNV Flex director Erik Pentenga expressed disappointment, labelling the court's decision as questionable and accusing Temper of spreading misinformation. The judges, however, dismissed this claim, stating that the defence failed and emphasising the necessity of clear rules regarding platform work in the Netherlands.
This development adds a new chapter to the ongoing struggle between unions and emerging gig economy platforms. As the legal battles with Uber and Deliveroo continue, the court's decision suggests that establishing proper regulations for platform-based work remains a crucial task. The verdict reflects a balancing act between workers seeking autonomy and unions advocating for broader societal contributions in an evolving employment landscape.
Read the original article here.
.jpeg)
